�°������ϲ���Ļ��Ϣ

Frugal companies succeed commercially in part because they consistently control spending and are resourceful with people and products rather than cutting costs reactively, according to a new �°������ϲ���Ļ��Ϣ Davis study.

The paper, forthcoming in the journal Contemporary Accounting Research, explores frugality as a business culture rather than as a reaction to recession.

“The research was motivated by all of the headlines that came out during the worst parts of the recession indicating that firms were becoming frugal, as evidenced by layoffs and other cuts,” said Shannon W. Anderson, a professor at the �°������ϲ���Ļ��Ϣ Davis Graduate School of Management and co-author of the study.

“My own experience working with companies on cost management made me very skeptical of the validity of characterizing these actions as evidence of frugality,” Anderson said.

The research confirmed that “today’s reactive, heavy-handed cost cutting is the antithesis of true frugality,” and should not be mistaken for frugality, she said.

The paper, “Corporate Frugality: Theory, Measurement and Practice,” was co-authored by Anne M. Lillis of the University of Melbourne in Victoria, Australia.

“We find that frugal companies control labor costs through greater use of incentive pay; control material costs through supplier sourcing strategies; and focus capital expenditures on efficiency-enhancing investments,” the study reports.

The paper used a mix of field research and surveys in 2008 and 2009 to collect information from corporate executives on frugality as a company characteristic, a topic that has been largely absent from accounting and management literature.

Anderson and Lillis looked at 10 large firms, existing literature on individual companies, and research on consumer frugality to assess corporate frugality. The research was conducted in the United States and in Australia.

The study identified IKEA, Southwest and Walmart as examples of frugal companies whose accomplishments are cited in the media and elsewhere, but does not name the companies or individuals in companies who were surveyed.

The study notes that top executives have a major influence on a company’s practices, and that mergers or changes in management can affect a company’s culture.

While the research drew a distinction between frugality and reactive cost-cutting, it does not establish whether frugal management is superior or whether there are downsides to frugality.
“We've made a strong start in showing that frugality is an enduring feature of corporate culture and that frugal companies manage differently,” Anderson said.

The full paper can be found at: .

About the �°������ϲ���Ļ��Ϣ Davis Graduate School of Management

Established in 1981, the �°������ϲ���Ļ��Ϣ Davis Graduate School of Management offers an interactive and collaborative learning environment distinguished by globally visible faculty renowned for their research and teaching, innovative and entrepreneurial students, a rigorous MBA curriculum, strong connections to the business community and prime locations in Northern California’s economic hubs. The �°������ϲ���Ļ��Ϣ Davis MBA program is ranked among the top 6 percent in the nation by US News & World Report. The Economist ranks the school’s faculty No. 3 in the world; and The Financial Times ranks �°������ϲ���Ļ��Ϣ Davis among the top 10 percent of accredited business schools worldwide. The Aspen Institute's Center for Business Education recognizes the school among the best in the world for integrating issues of social and environmental stewardship into curricula and research.