°ϲĻϢ

Genomic Analysis Reveals Many Animal Species May Be Vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 Infection

News
Gorilla
The Western lowland gorilla shows a very high risk of being infected by SARS-CoV-2 through its ACE2 receptors according to a new genomic study from °ϲĻϢ Davis. (Credit: Smithsonian’s National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute)

Quick Summary

  • A large number of mammals can potentially be infected by SARS-CoV-2 through their ACE2 receptors
  • Some endangered species are at highest-risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection through ACE2
  • These species are potentially vulnerable to spillover of SARS-CoV-2 from humans and should be the focus of surveillance and conservation efforts
  • The study can assist in the identification of an intermediate host or hosts for SARS-CoV-2

Humans are not the only species facing a potential threat from SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19, according to a from the University of California, Davis.

An international team of scientists used genomic analysis to compare the main cellular receptor for the virus in humans — angiotensin converting enzyme-2, or ACE2 — in 410 different species of vertebrates, including birds, fish, amphibians, reptiles and mammals.

ACE2 is normally found on many different types of cells and tissues, including epithelial cells in the nose, mouth and lungs. In humans, 25 amino acids of the ACE2 protein are important for the virus to bind and gain entry into cells.  

The researchers used these 25 amino acid sequences of the ACE2 protein, and modeling of its predicted protein structure together with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, to evaluate how many of these amino acids are found in the ACE2 protein of the different species.

“Animals with all 25 amino acid residues matching the human protein are predicted to be at the highest risk for contracting SARS-CoV-2 via ACE2,” said Joana Damas, first author for the paper and a postdoctoral research associate at °ϲĻϢ Davis. “The risk is predicted to decrease the more the species’ ACE2 binding residues differ from humans.”

About 40 percent of the species potentially susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 are classified as “threatened” by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and may be especially vulnerable to human-to-animal transmission. The study was published Aug. 21 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“The data provide an important starting point for identifying vulnerable and threatened animal populations at risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection,” said Harris Lewin, lead author for the study and a distinguished professor of evolution and ecology at °ϲĻϢ Davis. “We hope it inspires practices that protect both animal and human health during the pandemic.”

Endangered species predicted to be at risk

Several critically endangered primate species, such as the Western lowland gorilla, Sumatran orangutan and Northern white-cheeked gibbon, are predicted to be at very high risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2 via their ACE2 receptor.

Other animals flagged as high risk include marine mammals such as gray whales and bottlenose dolphins, as well as Chinese hamsters.

Infographic of species at risk Old World primates and great apes have identical amino acids at the binding site to humans and are
predicted to be at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. (Infographic by  Matt Verdolivo/°ϲĻϢ Davis)

Domestic animals such as cats, cattle and sheep were found to have a medium risk, and dogs, horses and pigs were found to have low risk for ACE2 binding. How this relates to infection and disease risk needs to be determined by future studies, but for those species that have known infectivity data, the correlation is high. 

In documented cases of SARS-COV-2 infection in , , , , , the virus may be using ACE2 receptors, or they may use receptors other than ACE2 to gain access to host cells. Lower propensity for binding could translate to lower propensity for infection, or lower ability for the infection to spread in an animal or between animals once established.

Because of the potential for animals to contract the novel coronavirus from humans, and vice versa, institutions including the and the , which both contributed genomic material to the study, have strengthened programs to protect both animals and humans.

“Zoonotic diseases and how to prevent human to animal transmission is not a new challenge to zoos and animal care professionals,” said co-author Klaus-Peter Koepfli, senior research scientist at Smithsonian-Mason School of Conservation and former conservation biologist with the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute’s Center for Species Survival and Center for Conservation Genomics. “This new information allows us to focus our efforts and plan accordingly to keep animals and humans safe.”

The authors urge caution against overinterpreting the predicted animal risks based on the computational results, noting the actual risks can only be confirmed with additional experimental data. The list of animals can be found .

Research has shown that the immediate ancestor of SARS-CoV-2 likely originated in a species of . Bats were found to be at very low risk of contracting the novel coronavirus via their ACE2 receptor, which is consistent with actual experimental data.

Whether bats directly transmitted the novel coronavirus directly to humans, or whether it went through an intermediate host, is not yet known, but the study supports the idea that one or more intermediate hosts was involved. The data allow researchers to zero in on which species might have served as an intermediate host in the wild, assisting efforts to control a future outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infection in human and animal populations.

Additional authors on the study include: Marco Corbo, °ϲĻϢ Davis Genome Center; Graham M. Hughes and Emma C. Teeling, University College Dublin, Ireland; Kathleen C. Keough and Katherine S. Pollard, Gladstone Institutes and °ϲĻϢ San Francisco; Corrie A. Painter, Nicole S. Persky, Diane P. Genereux, Ross Swofford, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh and Elinor K. Karlsson, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Mass.; Michael Hiller, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany; Andreas R. Pfenning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh; Huabin Zhao, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Oliver A. Ryder, San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, Escondido, and °ϲĻϢ San Diego; Martin T. Nweeia, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, and Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

The research in this study was coordinated as part of the , which includes the , Zoonomia, the and the . Genomic information for the study was also provided the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s , the San Diego Zoo’s and the Smithsonian’s . This work was supported by the Robert and Rosabel Osborne Endowment.

Media Resources

Harris Lewin, Evolution and Ecology, lewin@ucdavis.edu

Joana Damas, °ϲĻϢ Davis Genome Center, jmdamas@ucdavis.edu

Klaus-Peter Koepfli, Smithsonian-Mason School of Conservation, KoepfliK@si.edu

Annalisa Meyer, Smithsonian's National Zoo, 202-633-3081, MeyerAn@si.edu

Andy Fell, News and Media Relations, 530-752-4533, ahfell@ucdavis.edu

Primary Category

Secondary Categories

Science & Technology Human & Animal Health

Tags