аÄÃÅÁùºÏ²ÊÄÚÄ»ÐÅÏ¢

In the first large study to track the fate of a wide range of antibiotics given to dairy cows, аÄÃÅÁùºÏ²ÊÄÚÄ»ÐÅÏ¢ Davis scientists found that the drugs routinely end up on the ground and in manure lagoons, but are mostly broken down before they reach groundwater.

The findings should help alleviate longstanding fears that dairy farms, and the fields fertilized with their waste, might lead to large-scale groundwater contamination.

“What we found is that antibiotics can frequently be found at the manure-affected surfaces of the dairy operation (such as corrals and manure flush lanes) but generally degrade in the top 12 inches of soil," said Thomas Harter, an expert on the effects of agriculture on groundwater quality and the Robert M. Hagan Chair for Water Management and Policy at аÄÃÅÁùºÏ²ÊÄÚÄ»ÐÅÏ¢ Davis.

"A very small amount of certain antibiotics do travel into shallow groundwater. Our next task is to determine whether these particular antibiotics are further degraded before reaching domestic and public water wells."

Harter said the study findings should be particularly useful to people who get drinking water from wells (such as water companies and homeowners), dairy producers and policymakers. It provides the first comprehensive data set to assess and compare potential local impacts to groundwater from the wide variety of antibiotics in use on "freestall" dairy farms, where cows are free to enter and leave resting cubicles rather than being confined in stanchions or pens.

California is the nation's largest producer of milk and the second-largest producer of cheese, with 1.8 million milking cows. More than 90 percent of those are housed in freestall operations.

California dairies typically administer antibiotics to young cows (calves and heifers, which are cows that have not had a calf), and to nonlactating adult cows, but not to lactating, or "milking," adult cows.

Health officials are concerned that antibiotics could travel from cows' urine and feces into the groundwater that supplies drinking water to people and livestock, potentially fostering antibiotic resistance in disease-causing bacteria.

Harter said that the health effects of antibiotics in drinking water at the low levels he detected are not known.

The new аÄÃÅÁùºÏ²ÊÄÚÄ»ÐÅÏ¢ Davis study looked at two large freestall operations in the San Joaquin Valley, in a region with highly vulnerable groundwater due to its shallow depth and sandy soils. The two dairies had a total of more than 2,700 milking cows and 2,500 heifers.

Soil and water samples were collected from the ground surface under the animals; surfaces such as flush lanes, which carry waste; manure lagoons, where feces and urine are collected; farm fields where lagoon contents were spread for fertilizer; the first 12 inches of soil immediately below the surface of various sections in the dairy operation; and from groundwater 10 to 30 feet beneath the animal areas, adjacent to the lagoons, and beneath the manured fields.

(The study did not test surface water, such as creeks. Dairies are not permitted to discharge waste-containing runoff to surface water.)

Harter and colleagues from аÄÃÅÁùºÏ²ÊÄÚÄ»ÐÅÏ¢ Davis and the U.S. Geological Survey's Water Science Center in California conducted the field work in 2006-2008, with analytical support from the U.S. Geological Survey's Water Science Center in Kansas. The research was funded with $568,000 from the CALFED Bay-Delta Authority Drinking Water Program, which is administered by the California State Water Resources Control Board, and $65,000 from the California Department of Food and Agriculture, using funds collected from dairy producers to support research and marketing.

The study was published in the online version of Environmental Science & Technology, a journal of the American Chemical Society.